|
Is still a rose,
but this one stinks!
In 2003,
Neighborhood Code 4813 (This is the developments that are off from Valley
View Road and Tilden Ave. up to Higby Road)
was one of the neighborhoods that was reassessed. Note: In 2004, Neighborhood Code 4813 was
also trended 5%.
|
The parcels on my report are there
because:
-
there was a home on the parcel in years 2002
and 2003. If the parcel was a vacant lot in either year, it was not
included so as not to skew the report.
-
the home was in Neighborhood Code 4813 in 2003. The column
is highlighted in
blue for the year 2003, the year of the reassessment in Neighborhood
Code 4813. The report is currently sorted by the address of each
parcel.
If you would like to view an Adobe pdf copy of my
spreadsheet, please click here.
If you have a copy of Excel and would like the actual spreadsheets so you can
sort the information yourself, please click here.
Both versions are currently sorted by street.
Here are some facts
about Neighborhood Code 4813 and the 2003 reassessment:
-
523 homes were in Neighborhood Code 4813 in
2003 and only one appears to have been moved in from another neighborhood (Neighborhood 4809 -
Newer Subdivisions) since 2001.
-
However, of the 523 homes, 21% of those homes are not on the Valley View
side of Higby as the Neighborhood Code description would have you believe. They are
actually on the Chapman Road side of Higby. It would appear that their tax map number is
similar to homes on the Valley View side of Higby so that is probably
why they are in that neighborhood!
-
Of the 523 total homes in Neighborhood Code
4813, 323 (or 62%) of the homes were increased in 2003 and
6 homes (or 1%) were decreased, I would assume as a result
of Grievance. However, 186 homes (or 36%) of the homes
were not increased at all. To be fair, I also noted that 8
additional (or 1%) were not increased, but their 2002 sale price
justified no increase (these
parcels are highlighted gray on the spreadsheet). Therefore, I
have not
included the 8 parcels in the 186 "no increase" parcels.
-
I have also included sales that should have been taken into
account for the 2003 reassessment. There are more current sales
that you can view by using the
Assessment Program, but I wanted to show exactly what sales were
available at the time of the reassessment. Notice how some of the parcels clearly have sales that
are above their assessed value, yet no increase in assessment is noted. Some people even have additional
square feet of living space noted in the database, but no increase in assessment.
I'm curious as to why homes that clearly are Utica
Influenced according to the definitions are not included in this Neighborhood Code when others that by
definition should not be there are included. For example, Arlington
Terrace and Westminster Road both have 13501 (Utica) zip codes, but they are
not included. Also, Golden Place is not included. If you don't
know where Golden Place is--go down Valley View to Pleasant Street.
Turn right on Pleasant Street and the next right is Golden Place. It
is within walking distance of the Memorial Parkway in Utica, but it is not
Utica Influenced. However, the tax map number is not like the ones in
Neighborhood Code 4813 which is why is probably is not
included with this Neighborhood. One other home with a tax map number
like Golden Place (starting 330.012) is on Pleasant Street and was in Neighborhood Code 4809 to begin
with and then moved to 4813 (Utica Influenced) in 2002. So why didn't they moved Golden Place to Utica Influenced? How come every home on Wadsworth Road except for one is Neighborhood Code 4813 (Utica Influenced).
One home on Wadsworth Road is Neighborhood Code 4811 (Rural)--what's up with that?
The only thing I see is that the tax map number is different than the
other parcels on that street.
Take a look at Tilden Ave.--it is ridiculous. These are clearly placed
in neighborhoods because of their tax map number.
If that is how they divided the town and if it was the right thing to do, why didn't
they just come out and let everyone know that tax map number is what determined neighborhood codes.
Why the charade?
What was the methodology used to set up these neighborhood codes and just
what determined if your assessment was raised or not once they starting
reassessing different "neighborhoods"? Why bother with
neighborhood codes if you are going to randomly place homes wherever you
want? These are questions that only the assessor can answer.
Look at the report for any homes in your area or homes that you are familiar
with before you decide what these reports are showing. We certainly are not able to physically
look at all the properties that weren't increased. These reports
are provided for your information only. Sales for each property
are now included in the Assessment Program and would be helpful in
determining if a property has increased in value. If you think that because you are not in Neighborhood
Code 4801, 4807, 4809 or 4813 this doesn't affect you, think again. It impacts everyone!
Stay tuned for our review of other neighborhoods!
If these reports bother you, we urge you to call your councilman.
Unless we let them know how we feel, they will continue to deny there is a
problem. They seem to be good at doing just that!
|
|
What is a Neighborhood Code? |
|
The International Association of Assessing
Officers (IAAO) defines a neighborhood as "(1) The environment of a subject property that has a direct
and immediate effect on value. (2) A geographic area of properties sharing important location
characteristics defined for purposes of market analysis or modeling (typically with fewer than several
thousand properties)." Notice both of these definitions revolve around the
notion of effect of location on value.
In simpler terms, a "neighborhood"
consists of properties that are comparable in terms of the probability of a
buyer being equally as interested in buying House A as they would be in
buying House B. In other words, if I
was a
buyer, I would not be interested in looking at a house in a neighborhood code made up
with homes that are 1,000 sq. ft. when I intend to buy a 5,000 sq. ft. home.
Therefore, the 1,000 sq. ft. home should not be in the same neighborhood
code as the 5,000 sq.
ft. home. |
Online Assessment Program
|