Online Assessment Program


New Hartford, N.Y.
New Hartford, N.Y. Online Homepage
New Hartford, N.Y. Online sitemap
Neighborhood Codes
Sherman Lane
When Pigs Fly in New Hartford, N.Y.

We felt the report for Sherman Lane deserved its own page--it fairly well sums up the whole assessment debacle.  If anyone is left doubting whether or not the assessment process in the Town of New Hartford is fair, click on the underlined street name above to view a pdf version of the spreadsheet.  We have color-coded the neighborhoods so you can easily see the changes and we also color-coded the print color for each parcel to correspond with the written report below.  Also, please refer to the Color Key on the spreadsheet for detail.  You will need an 8 1/2 by 14 piece of paper to print the spreadsheet on one page.  Otherwise, you will need to tape two pages together after you print.

Look at the spreadsheet.  There are 13 homes on Sherman Lane.  Two of the homes (in the red print) have never been reassessed or trended. These two homes were moved from neighborhood code 4811 (rural) to 4807 (Older Subdivision) in 2003.  In 2003, they reassessed Neighborhood Code 4807, yet they didn't reassess these two. Then in 2004, they moved them back to Neighborhood 4811 (Rural)--that would be the year that neighborhood was reassessed, but they didn't reassess them in 2004 either.    In fact, 1 Sherman Lane, according to the assessment database, the owner even added 540 sq. ft. of living space (square feet on the spreadsheet in  2002 was 2289 sq. ft. and in 2003 it was increased to 2829 sq. ft.) but no increase in assessment. So they would like us to believe that these two homes have seen no increase in market value since 1995, the year that the Town of New Hartford last hired an "outside" appraisal firm to reassess the entire town.  O.K.--moving right along.

Next 3 homes (in blue print)--4, 5, & 7 Sherman Lane were also moved from neighborhood code 4811 (rural) to 4807 (Older Subdivision) in 2003--that would be the year that they reassessed neighborhood 4807.  Strange though, they moved them into the 4807 neighborhood code, but they never reassessed any of these homes in 2003. Why would you move them into a neighborhood and then not reassess them?   Instead they moved them back to Neighborhood Code 4811 (rural) in 2004 and then reassessed them in 2004.  Don't know why they moved them in the first place.  Rural--older subdivision--rural--hmm!

Now look at the tax map numbers of each of the properties on Sherman Lane--do you notice that the homes 1-7 have a different tax map number than houses numbered 8-18. Do you think that might have something to do with the fact that there are 2 different neighborhood codes on Sherman Lane?

Now let's look at the homes numbered 8 - 18. They are all in Neighborhood Code 4813 -- a Neighborhood that was reassessed in 2003 and then trended 5% in 2004.  Look close at 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14 (in purple print) on the spreadsheet. They were not reassessed in 2003 even though Neighborhood Code 4813 was reassessed that year. These 5 homes were only trended 5% in 2004.  Why didn't they reassess them in 2003--they were in a Neighborhood that was reassessed?

You will notice that only 3 homes (10, 16 & 18 Sherman Lane in black print)  were actually reassessed in 2003 and then trended 5% in 2004. That is 3 out of 13 homes or about 23% of the homes on that street that were actually reassessed and trended.  Imagine this on a street that certainly does not qualify as "less desirable" than other streets in town who did see as much as 20% - 30% increases in assessed value.   So that leaves 77% of the homes on Sherman Lane that were either only increased 5% in 2004 or didn't increase at all since 1995.  Fair assessing?   You decide.

What is equally as troubling is that not one of our councilmen has enough "gumption" to speak up.  And I know that at least 2 of the councilmen are reading my website on a regular basis not to mention the fact that we have made sure that they are all aware of the situation.  I guess they are just too busy deciding how to spend more of our money.

Take a look at our other spreadsheets (in pdf format--you will need 8.5 by 14 paper to print or you will have to piece smaller sheets together after printing) Paris Road, Higby Road, Jordan Road and Lloyds Lane.  More streets will be added.

Please keep watching this site if you want to know what really happened.  Email us New Hartford, N.Y. Online if you have any questions or better yet, check with the assessor to see if he agrees with our reports and then ask him "How Come?"

What is a Neighborhood Code?

The International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) defines a neighborhood as "(1) The environment of a subject property that has a direct and immediate effect on value.  (2)  A geographic area of properties sharing important location characteristics defined for purposes of market analysis or modeling (typically with fewer than several thousand properties)."  Notice both of these definitions revolve around the notion of effect of location on value.

In simpler terms, a "neighborhood" consists of properties that are comparable in terms of the probability of a buyer being equally as interested in buying House A as they would be in buying House B.  In other words, if I was a buyer, I would not be interested in looking at a house in a neighborhood code made up with homes that are 1,000 sq. ft. when I intend to buy a 5,000 sq. ft. home. Therefore, the 1,000 sq. ft. home should not be in the same neighborhood code as the 5,000 sq. ft. home.


Home Site Map Assessment Program Garbage In - Garbage Out Neighborhood Codes


All Graphics and programming copyright ©2003-2007  j-cl   All rights reserved.